AMSOIL Proves Superior in Clark County Field Test
In order to demonstrate the effectiveness
of AMSOIL
15W-40 Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine
Motor Oil and the AMSOIL
Dual-Gard filtration system in reducing operating
expenses, AMSOIL and Direct Dealer Bill Andes
began an ongoing field test in October 1998 with
the bus fleet of the Clark County Board of Mental
Retardation & Developmental Disabilities (MR/DD)
in Springfield, Ohio.
Participating in the field test are three 1997
International 3800 school buses, two equipped
with International 466 diesel engines and one
with an International 466E diesel engine. Each
had previously been running a conventional petroleum-based
oil.
Prior to starting
the field test, four goals were set:
1. |
The reduction of
fuel consumption through the superior lubricity
and reduced viscometric drag provided by AMSOIL
15W-40 Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine
Motor Oil . Verification of this goal
will be obtained by com-paring previously
documented fuel mileage reports using petroleum
oils with fuel mileage reports of the same
vehicles now using AMSOIL diesel oil. |
2. |
The extension of
fluid drain intervals due to the superior
synthetic chemistry and additive system
of AMSOIL Synthetic Heavy
Duty Diesel and Marine Motor Oil, along
with the additional efficiency provided
by the AMSOIL Dual-Gard filtration system. |
3. |
The reduction of
maintenance costs due to the superior wear
protection and extended drain intervals
provided by AMSOIL Synthetic Heavy Duty
Diesel and Marine Motor Oil and the AMSOIL
Dual-Gard filtration system. |
4. |
Provide the above-mentioned
benefits without com-promising the mechanical
integrity of the equipment. |
Baseline samples of the petroleum oil already
in the crankcase were obtained, tested and documented.
Next, the oil was drained and the engines flushed
with AMSOIL Engine Flush. AMSOIL BMK-12 Filter
Mounts, two BE-110 By-pass
Filtration elements and AMSOIL 15W-40 Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine Motor Oil
were installed in each vehicle.
Oil samples from each bus are drawn and tested
at 4000-mile intervals, the normal oil drain interval
practiced by MR/DD when using conventional lubricants.
Data obtained from the oil samples serves to determine
the following:
1. |
Fluid and vehicle
baselines |
2. |
The mechanical
condition of the vehicles |
3. |
Ability of the
equipment to continue functioning as a demonstration
vehicle |
4. |
Rate of internal
equipment wear |
5. |
Serviceability
of fluids and filters |
Once drawn, each oil sample is reviewed in the
areas of elemental analysis (including wear metals,
contaminates and additives), physical properties
(including viscosity, total acid number and total
base number) and contamination (including water,
solids, glycol, oxidation, fuel soot and fuel
dilution). Oil condemnation limits vary due to
individual engine idiosyncrasies, operating conditions
and time the fluid has been in service.
Bus
Number |
Miles
on AMSOIL without being changed |
#
of Petroleum oil changes (based on 4,000-mile
interval) |
#
of AMSOIL oil changes (based on proposed 10,000-mile interval) |
4 |
45,465 |
12 |
5 |
7 |
71,185 |
18 |
8 |
22 |
65,776 |
17 |
7 |
Observations
As of May 1, 2001, the buses had accumulated
a total of 182,426 miles without oil changes,
and several benefits associated with running the
AMSOIL products have been realized. First, both
labor and vehicle downtime have been reduced.
While using the previous petroleum-based motor
oil, the Clark County Board of MR/DD was accustomed
to changing oil at 4,000-mile intervals. They
now plan to extend their intervals to 10,000 miles
and beyond if supported by oil analysis results.
The chart below shows the comparison figures.
As for the aftermarket full flow oil filters,
the original intention was to change them every
6,000 to 10,000 miles, but after careful review
of oil analysis results, it was determined that
because of the efficiency of the AMSOIL Dual-Gard
filtration system, 10,000- to 12,000-mile intervals
were easily obtainable on the full-flow filters.
For demonstration purposes, the BE-110 filter
elements remained unchanged for a 2-year period.
However, after review, it was deter-mined that
under normal conditions it would be beneficial
to change them after a 40,000- to 50,000-mile
interval.
Engine wear rates have decreased significantly
since changing to AMSOIL 15W-40
Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine Motor Oil.
High temperature operating conditions have also
been reduced. This leads to enhanced engine protection,
and ultimately, to longer engine life. Because
the engines have been operating more efficiently,
three to five percent gains in fuel economy have
also been realized. The chart below compares the
levels of wear particles present in the previous
conventional oil with the levels present in the
AMSOIL as of May 2001. The condition of the AMSOIL
at various testing intervals is documented below.
Conclusion
Overall, this field demonstration was highly
successful for AMSOIL. The oil analysis data indicate
that AMSOIL products deliver uncompromising protection
and performance. AMSOIL pro-vides longer equipment
life and reduced downtime, longer drain intervals,
significant decreases in wear rates and operating
temperatures and dramatic improvement in engine
performance when compared to conventional petroleum
oils.
Oil Analysis - Bus
#4 |
|
Percent (%) of the
amount allowable |
Parts
Per Million (ppm) |
Mileage |
Viscosity
(100°C) |
OXD |
NOX |
TBN |
Fe
(Iron) |
Pb
(Lead) |
Cu
(Copper) |
Al
(Aluminum) |
0 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3883 |
11.6 |
7.8 |
4.3 |
12.7 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
5378 |
12.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
9.9 |
20 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
9700 |
14.0 |
4.4 |
7.1 |
13.0 |
40 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
22885 |
12.0 |
7.8 |
15.7 |
12.1 |
89 |
3 |
11 |
7 |
34059 |
12.4 |
21.1 |
15.7 |
12.4 |
134 |
5 |
30 |
12 |
45465 |
12.2 |
20.0 |
18.6 |
11.9 |
146 |
7 |
35 |
16 |
Oil Analysis - Bus
#7 |
|
Percent (%) of the
amount allowable |
Parts
Per Million (ppm) |
Mileage |
Viscosity
(100°C) |
OXD |
NOX |
TBN |
Fe
(Iron) |
Pb
(Lead) |
Cu
(Copper) |
Al
(Aluminum) |
0 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3614 |
12.8 |
1.0 |
2.8 |
12.9 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
4126 |
13.6 |
3.3 |
4.3 |
9.8 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
10607 |
13.9 |
2.2 |
10.0 |
11.9 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
22428 |
12.9 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
12.2 |
30 |
5 |
27 |
8 |
31569 |
13.2 |
15.6 |
14.3 |
11.0 |
28 |
1 |
12 |
5 |
42647 |
13.6 |
25.6 |
18.6 |
10.6 |
61 |
12 |
38 |
9 |
58055 |
14.0 |
27.8 |
21.4 |
10.5 |
73 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
71185 |
14.2 |
17.8 |
20.0 |
10.7 |
53 |
16 |
14 |
6 |
Oil Analysis - Bus
#22 |
|
Percent (%) of the
amount allowable |
Parts
Per Million (ppm) |
Mileage |
Viscosity
(100°C) |
OXD |
NOX |
TBN |
Fe
(Iron) |
Pb
(Lead) |
Cu
(Copper) |
Al
(Aluminum) |
0 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2732 |
13.4 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
7.8 |
7 |
2 |
12 |
6 |
3680 |
12.3 |
7.8 |
4.3 |
12.8 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
14329 |
12.5 |
5.6 |
10.0 |
12.9 |
14 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
20905 |
13.4 |
11.1 |
10.0 |
12.3 |
26 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
30671 |
12.8 |
6.7 |
11.4 |
9.1 |
28 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
41196 |
13.1 |
16.7 |
14.3 |
11.7 |
36 |
6 |
11 |
7 |
52983 |
13.7 |
21.1 |
15.7 |
11.2 |
44 |
7 |
19 |
7 |
65776 |
13.8 |
12.2 |
14.3 |
11.0 |
49 |
0 |
10 |
8 |
Oil
Analysis Comparison: Petroleum Oil at 4,000
miles vs. AMSOIL Motor Oil at 45,465 miles
to 71,185 miles |
Vehicle |
Metal |
Type
of Oil |
Parts
Per Million |
Type
of Oil |
Parts
Per Million |
%
Reduction |
Bus
#4 |
Iron
(Fe) |
Rotella |
170 |
AMSOIL |
146 |
-14% |
Copper (Cu) |
34 |
35 |
+3% |
Aluminum
(Al) |
68 |
16 |
-76% |
Lead (Pb) |
26 |
7 |
-73% |
Average |
- 44% |
Vehicle |
Metal |
Type
of Oil |
Parts
Per Million |
Type
of Oil |
Parts
Per Million |
%
Reduction |
Bus
#7 |
Iron
(Fe) |
Rotella |
126 |
AMSOIL |
53 |
-58% |
Copper (Cu) |
42 |
14 |
-67% |
Aluminum
(Al) |
98 |
6 |
-94% |
Lead (Pb) |
42 |
16 |
-62% |
Average |
- 70% |
Vehicle |
Metal |
Type
of Oil |
Parts
Per Million |
Type
of Oil |
Parts
Per Million |
%
Reduction |
Bus
#22 |
Iron
(Fe) |
Rotella |
136 |
AMSOIL |
49 |
-64% |
Copper (Cu) |
234 |
10 |
-96% |
Aluminum
(Al) |
117 |
8 |
-93% |
Lead (Pb) |
39 |
0 |
-100% |
Average |
- 88% |
|